Posts Tagged ‘punishment’

Oct22009

Roman Polanski has a Fighting Chance and Nothing to Lose

The man famous for his Hollywood movies, murdered wife, and life as a fugitive may be extradited from Switzerland to a Los Angeles, California courtroom. Polanski faces sentencing in a felony sex case over three decades old. He fled the United States jurisdiction after he pleaded guilty and before the sentencing hearing. He has a few options, however.

His lawyer’s first option will be to move to dismiss his case. The misconduct of his judge and a prosecutor in his case provides ample ammunition for a dismissal in the interests of justice.

He may also move to withdraw his plea. The law provides that a criminal defendant may withdraw his or her guilty plea for “good cause.” Good cause is an elastic concept, one that will almost certainly embrace the broken promises made by the judge and the other misconduct pervading his prosecution.  Withdrawing his plea has some risks, most obviously that he would face charges substantially more serious charges than the one he is now facing (charges that will carry mandatory prison time – no probation).  On the other hand, his attorney may calculate that the D.A. does not have sufficient evidence anymore to prosecute the case to verdict. Polanski would then be in even a better position than he is now – no conviction on his record.

Polanski’s last option is to face the sentencing squarely. Other Los Angeles judges have made favorable findings in his case, even in his absence. Polanski’s attorney can without doubt demonstrate an abundance of reasons that favor probation both as to the offense and the offender. An astute criminal lawyer may conclude, therefore, that the risk of a state prison sentence is very remote, and the likelihood of probation, and credit for time served, is very high.

The prosecution may elect to file a felony charge for failing to appear in court, but this will likely be defeated by their own failure for many years to make any real attempt to bring him to justice.

The battle is far from over, but Polanski is unlikely to suffer any further punishment in this case.

Aug242009

Michael Jackson’s Death Ruled a Homicide: Murder Charges Possible?

Now that the Los Angeles Coroner has ruled Michael Jackson’s death a homicide, what charges will be contemplated by the Office of the District Attorney? Two charges are possible. A second degree murder charge is possible if it can be proved that injecting Jackson with the powerful anesthetic propofol was done under circumstances where the drug giver was actually aware of the risk of death from use of the drug but consciously disregarded that risk and unlawfully gave him the drug anyway. Involuntary manslaughter is possible where the lawful administration of the drug was conducted in a negligent manner. The punishment for second degree murder is 15 years to life in prison. Involuntary manslaughter is punishable by up to 6 years in prison. Other than punishment, the big difference between the two charges obviously concerns the state-of-mind of the defendant, whether he or she understood but ignored the actual risks involved with giving a person the drug. Presumably, a doctor would have a subjective awareness of the risks but at the same time would take actions to safeguard the patient’s welfare. The charge one would therefore expect to see in this case – if any -will be involuntary manslaughter. The circumstances relevant to determining what charge to file will include: who administered the drug, how they acquired the drug, whether they were aware of the nature and type of drug being administered, the side effects of the drug, their knowledge of the effects, the actual dosage, whether the drug was administered in a prudent and careful manner, and other factors that may bear on their subjective awareness of the dangers presented by the drug and on the issue of negligent supervision of the patient. The criminal defense attorney for Jackson’s cardiologist doctor, Conrad Murray, says his client gave Jackson nothing that “should have” killed him. In other words, the lawyer argues that the issue is whether an involuntary manslaughter occurred or no crime at all.